Source: DepositPhotos
The New Zealand government’s ultra-fast broadband programme has made fibre nearly ubiquitous in the country. So much so that, as of 2021, 94% of New Zealanders use the internet, according to Statista.
Despite that impressive statistic, many citizens grapple with broadband access issues, while the factors responsible for them are as plentiful as the broadband providers in the country.
This article examines those factors after reflecting on the Government's broadband initiative. Additionally, it reveals two side effects borne from the government’s rollout, and attempts to offer possible solutions that could help.
To understand the issues related to broadband access, we need to start at the beginning.
In 2008, the National Party campaigned on the promise of rolling out an Ultra-fast Broadband Initiative.
The program was scheduled to be completed at the end of 2022 and aimed to make fibre broadband available to 75% of the population by 2019 (including rural communities and underserved communities). That initial goal was expanded in 2017 to make fibre accessible to 87% of New Zealanders.
Meanwhile, the initiative aimed to provide speeds of at least 100 Mbps and 50 Mbps upload and download speeds respectively.
New Zealand's government earmarked over a billion NZ Dollars as the investment amount and planned to partner with local fibre companies to facilitate the nationwide rollout of the broadband infrastructure.
Through the crown-owned company Crown Fibre Holdings Limited, the government partnered with four fibre companies:
The Crown owns stakes in all four and shares ownership with local governments or electrical companies. Chorus, a spin-off of the Telecom company Spark, got the lion's share of the rollout area, followed by Enable Networks, Ultrafast Fibre, and, finally, Northpower Fibre.
Originally beginning with larger cities and densely populated areas, the programme later expanded into rural areas and remote locales. New Zealand’s government reached its goal for the original initiative in 2019, after bringing fibre to 33 areas that collectively house 75% of New Zealand residents.
Part two of the initiative (UFB2) began in early 2017 and aimed to roll out fibre broadband in 150 towns, expanding coverage to 85% of the population. Finally, in mid-2017, it was proposed that UFB2+ would provide fibre broadband to 190 additional towns by 2024, rounding out the remaining 2% of the original 87% coverage goal.
According to this post on the Controller and Auditor-General of Tumuaki o te Mana Arotake website, the government followed six guiding principles when rolling out its initiative, namely that the UFB should:
Thanks to the above principles, industries that rely on fast internet (e.g., telehealth services and remote learning) can thrive. In addition, through the government’s Rural Broadband Initiative, select rural areas can get broadband coverage.
On the 14th of December 2022, the government reached its goal. The Minister for Digital Economy and Communications, David Clark, stated:
“Over 1.8 million homes across 412 cities and towns now have access to world-class connectivity.”
He went on to add that:
“Fast, reliable connectivity has been especially crucial in recent years as it enabled us to learn, earn and socialise online when we weren’t able to leave our homes. It meant we could check in with doctors, and run our businesses – it allowed us to stay connected with our friends and whānau.”
As comprehensive as the programme is, there are still many areas in the country that don’t have broadband. For example, the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment states on its website that:
“It is not cost-effective to provide UFB in every rural community. Instead, the Rural Broadband Initiative (RBI) is providing faster internet to hundreds of thousands of rural homes and businesses outside UFB areas.”
Crown Infrastructure Partners offers a similar explanation. The company is charged with “managing the Government’s $1.7 billion investment in Ultra-Fast Broadband” and “rolling out rural broadband and mobile coverage under the Rural Broadband Initiative phase two.” It writes on its website:
“Fibre is a service best suited to higher-density areas and is less cost-effective when there are long leads between properties or long driveways. Fibre areas were determined by commercial negotiations, and population size and density were key considerations in determining the towns and areas that were included in the UFB programme.
The UFB programme was allocated a set amount of funding and CIP sought to gain the maximum coverage with this. However, it is not enough to cover every household and business that currently cannot access fibre.”
If you want to make sure your area doesn’t fall within this category, use our fibre checker to confirm availability.
Despite Federal Government efforts to expand broadband access across the country, not everyone has high-speed internet. The Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) identified the following reasons for some people's lack of broadband internet access in a 2020 Spotlight report. They include:
The above shows that there are multiple factors that impede broadband access in the country, each one hampering the government’s UFB drive.
Two of the most prominent side effects that arose from internet access issues are digital exclusion and a widening of the digital divide.
In its 2022 report, the CAB defines digital exclusion as "situations where people face barriers to participating fully in society because of information and services being online." The report follows that definition by stating:
“This can mean they experience difficulties accessing the information or services they need, come up against obstacles when trying to act on their rights or fulfil their obligations, or encounter challenges in being able to navigate processes and systems to get the outcomes they want...
Meanwhile, Stanford University defines the digital divide as “the growing gap between the underprivileged members of society, especially the poor, rural, elderly, and handicapped portion of the population who do not have access to computers or the internet; and the wealthy, middle-class, and young Americans living in urban and suburban areas who have access.”
The above two definitions reveal that the positive effects of the government's push to provide internet access for all won’t be universally felt. While internet service providers and a large section of the population have benefited from the UFB Initiative, a minority of New Zealanders may suffer for it.
Digital exclusion led the CAB to make a petition titled “Petition of Citizens Advice Bureau New Zealand: Leave no-one behind - Campaign to address digital exclusion.”
In its petition, the organisation requested that the Parliament “address and provide for people facing barriers when engaging with information and services online.”
Additionally, the petition suggested that the House of Representatives should:
The Parliament debated this petition on the 28th of July 2022 after setting up a Petition Committee to look it over.
Related: Internet Outage Checker
Stanford University proffers solutions to the digital divide issue that could also rectify broadband access problems. The solutions include:
The above are just two of many possible solutions the government can mull over. No doubt, it has plans in the works that will ensure more of its citizens come online and enjoy the benefit of its fibre programme.
Broadband access is essential and the New Zealand government was right to focus on providing fibre broadband to the majority of the population. However, many people still face issues accessing broadband in the country. Some of the many causes include impediments posed by disabilities, financial barriers, and basic literacy.
To add insult to injury, the initiative may cause the digital divide in the country to widen and many digitally-excluded groups won’t feel the positive effects of the programme. Ultimately, the government will need to put measures in place that ensure no one gets left behind.